APPLICATION OF A MULTI-CRITERIA APPROACH TO ASSESSING CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES OF RUSSIAN REGIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2071-2367-2024-19-6-149-175Keywords:
строительная индустрия, оценка состояния строительной отрасли региона, рейтинг строительных отраслей регионов, Topsis, краснодарский край, ростовская область, ставропольский край, волгоградская областьAbstract
The purpose of the article is to present the results of expanding the scope of one of the methods of multi-criteria assessment using the distance metric - TOPSIS for a comparative assessment of the state of the construction industries of the subjects of the Southern Federal District and identifying the possibilities of its application to assess the state and development of the construction industry in individual regions. The analytical capabilities of the system of regional calculations of the construction industry of a number of regions of the Southern Federal District as one of the dynamically developing sectors of the Russian economy, contributing to the improvement of the quality of life of the population, are studied. To solve the problems of assessing the state of the construction industry in the regions, the author used the TOPSIS method (The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution), based on the idea of assessing the distance metric. The effectiveness of using TOPSIS in solving problems of fuzzy multi-criteria optimization is substantiated, in particular, assessing the construction industries of the regions within the Southern Federal District. Based on the application of the TOPSIS statistical method, uneven development of the construction industry in the regions of Russia is noted. The application of the methodology made it possible to identify the features of their differentiation and develop a model using a multi-criteria approach in the formation of a comprehensive rating of the state of the construction industries of several leading regions from the subjects of the Southern Federal District. Using the developed model, a rating assessment of the state of the construction industries of the following regions selected for the study was made: Volgograd Region, Krasnodar Territory, Rostov Region and Stavropol Territory from 2012 to 2022. The resulting calculations of the integral assessments for the construction industry of each of the subjects make it possible to ensure the clarity and validity of conclusions regarding their state due to the multi-criteria formulation of the problem (seven criteria). The results obtained also made it possible to draw practical conclusions regarding the current areas of geographical diversification of activities and the restructuring of the value chains of products of companies in the construction industry of the Southern Federal District. The results of using the presented model based on the application of the TOPSIS method, illustrating the dynamics of the indicators of the comprehensive rating of the state of the construction industries of the subjects of the Southern Federal District, through multi-dimensional scaling provide an effective way of obtaining visual information about the prospects for the development of the industry.Downloads
References
Адаменко, А. А. Анализ развития строительной отрасли Краснодарского края, ее место в экономике региона / А. А. Адаменко, А. Ф. Инюкин, Н. В. Никифоров // Вестник Академии знаний. - 2022. - № 49(2). - С. 8-12. - EDN AKOHBD.
Боровских, О. Н. Жилищное строительство как драйвер развития сельских территорий Российской Федерации / О. Н. Боровских, А. Х. Евстафьева // Вестник Казанского государственного аграрного университета. - 2023. - Т. 18, № 4(72). - С. 110-118. - DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2023-110-118. EDN HRDHDB.
Головин А.А., Бороздина Е.Н. Оценка объемов деятельности предприятий строительной сферы регионов Центрального Федерального Округа // Производственные технологии будущего: от создания к внедрению Материалы IV Международной научно-практической конференции. Редколлегия: С.И. Сухоруков (отв. ред.), А.С. Гудим, Н.Н. Любушкина. / А.А. Головин, Е.Н. Бороздина Комсомольск-на-Амуре, 2021 DOI: 10.17084/978-5-7765-1468-5_2021_324 - EDN RGMKKY
Григорьев А.В. Методика применения TOPSIS в региональном строительстве // Российский журнал экономики. 2020. № 7(3). С. 25-34. DOI: 10.20521/rje.2020.07.03.025.
Дуканич Л.В., Селютин В.В. Системный анализ. Учебно-методические материалы. / Дуканич Л.В., Селютин В.В. Ростов-н/Д: ЦБРР, 2003.
Дуканич, Л. В. Сравнительная оценка отраслевой инвестиционной привлекательности с территориальной привязкой: инструментально-методический подход / Л. В. Дуканич // Финансовая аналитика: проблемы и решения. - 2015. - № 5(239). - С. 2-9. EDN TGTEAV.
Кузнецов С.П., Лазарев А.А. Применение многокритериального анализа для оценки инвестиционного климата региона // Экономика и управление. 2019. № 12. С. 45-51. DOI: 10.2139/eam.2019.1205.
Тихонов В.И. Многокритериальные модели оценки устойчивости регионального развития // Вестник экономики. 2018. № 2(14). С. 87-94. DOI: 10.25147/eco.2018.14.02.087
Tavana M., Hatami-Marbini А. A group AHP-TOPSIS framework for human spaceflight mission planning at NASA. / Tavana M., Hatami-Marbini А. Lidam Reprints CORE 2362, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), 2011.
Shih H.S., Shyura H.J., Lee E.S. An Extension of TOPSIS for Group Decision Making // Journal of Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 2007. Vol. 45, No. 7. P. 801-813. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.05.019.
Deny Jollyta. TOPSIS Technique for Selecting of Property Development Location // Software Engineering. 2018. Vol. 6, No. 1. P. 20-26. DOI: 10.11648/j.se.20180601.14.
Arora R., Coates T. Evaluation of Regional Competitiveness through Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques // International Journal of Regional Studies. 2016. Vol. 8, no. 2. P. 35-50. DOI: 10.2139/ijrs.2016.014.
Goulet S., Tavella F. Regional Sustainability Assessment Using TOPSIS // International Journal of Sustainable Development. 2014. Vol. 6, No. 4. P. 115-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsd.2014.05.011.
Yang T., Chou P. Solving a Multi-Response Simulation Optimization Problem // Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Simulation. 2005. Vol. 68, No. 2. P. 9-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2004.10.013.
Zeleny M. A Concept of Compromise Solutions and the Method of the Displaced Ideal // Journal of Computers and Operations Research. 1974. Vol. 1, No. 4. P. 479-496. DOI: 10.1016/0305-0548(74)90033-5.
Yoon K.P., Hwang C.L. Manufacturing Plant Location Analysis by Multiple Attribute Decision Making // International Journal of Production Research. 1985. Vol. 23, no.2. P. 345-359. DOI: 10.1080/00207548508904603.
